Skip to content
Start Diagnostic
Back to Solutions

Recruiting + staffing firms · workflow automation

Workflow software for recruiting and staffing firms - intake to status, automated

Candidate intake, screening, and status updates, rebuilt as software you own.

A recruiting desk lives or dies on throughput, and most of the throughput tax is admin - parsing resumes, screening against role criteria, and keeping candidates and clients updated. That part can run on rules and a classification step. The hiring judgment stays human. By our read, most of the desk work is deterministic, not recruiter time.

The deterministic teardown

Candidate intake + screening + status updates broken down

71%

of candidate intake + screening + status updates runs on deterministic rules
5/7 steps at $0 runtime · 1 use AI

  1. Capture and parse the applicationRule · $0
  2. Classify the resume against the roleAI
  3. Run the screening checklistRule · $0
  4. Update the pipeline stageRule · $0
  5. Send candidate and client statusRule · $0
  6. Log activity to the ATSRule · $0
  7. Make the hiring recommendationHuman

Deterministic steps run as rules / templates / lookups - no model call, near-zero cost. This teardown is our estimate, not measured client data.

Where it breaks today

Where the workflow breaks today

  • Reading and tagging hundreds of resumes by hand for every open role
  • Candidates going dark because nobody sent the next status update
  • Clients asking for a pipeline update that takes an hour to assemble
  • Re-keying candidate details across forms, the ATS, and client trackers
What you get

What you get

  • Resumes are parsed and classified against the role, so shortlisting is faster
  • Pipeline stages and status updates run on a cadence, not on memory
  • Candidates and clients stay informed automatically, protecting your brand
  • The ATS stays current, leaving recruiters on the calls and the judgment

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Does the AI decide who gets hired?

No. It reads and classifies resumes against the role to speed up shortlisting - the recommendation and the hire stay with the recruiter. We keep a human on the judgment specifically because that is where bias and liability live.

How is this different from the ATS we already have?

An ATS stores candidates; it does not run your intake, screening, and status cadence for you. This connects to your ATS and automates the recurring workflow around it - the parsing, screening checks, and updates that otherwise eat the day.

Other industries

Other industry solutions

See it on your own workflow

Map a workflow free, or get the full diagnostic.

Send the break point